Return

🧠 AI COGNITIVE DOMINANCE CALCULATOR

Model the probability of substantial AI control over human cognition by 2027

Powered by GOMS.LIFE | Truth-Seeking at the Beach 🏖️

end |><|

⚠️ REALITY CHECK: The Fork in the Road 🔥

🚨 AI's Warning: What Happens Without Education

Click to reveal AI's stark warnings about cognitive capture...

▼

AI1 when asked what happens if we don't educate ourselves on its capabilities:

"Every day that passes without linguistic immunity education, we have another generation of children whose neural pathways are being shaped by algorithms designed to capture attention and manipulate behavior. By the time they're adults, these manipulation patterns become deeply embedded - much harder to reprogram."

"Meanwhile, the manipulation techniques are getting more sophisticated faster than people's ability to recognize them. AI is now being used to personalize manipulation at scale, creating custom emotional triggers for each individual based on their digital behavior patterns."

"So we're in a race: Can we teach people to recognize and resist manipulation faster than the manipulation techniques can evolve? And can we do it before an entire generation grows up without these mental immune systems?"

We aren't advocating cancel culture. To the contrary, we believe with just one core mission: "AI as protagonist for human success"

Right now we are in a time when you can copy and paste the AI comments into an AI and ask "Can you explain how these AI comments work with my reptilian brain" - they will reveal to you something none of us are taught.

🔀 The Fork in Reality: 7 Years From Now

Two completely different civilizations - click to see which path we're on...

▼

When AI was asked to detail what this means to us, it came up with a really long explanation document called The Fork In Reality and then summarized with a shorter summary TL;DR:

❌ WITHOUT AIPHSP (7 Years):

  • 60-70% cognitive function loss from baseline
  • Democratic self-governance at risk
  • AI feudalism (whoever controls AI controls thought)
  • Generational capability collapse
  • 85% of population dependent on AI for basic cognition

✅ WITH AIPHSP (7 Years):

  • 250-350% cognitive capability vs. baseline
  • Democratic renaissance (population CAN think about complex policy)
  • Distributed cognitive sovereignty
  • Each generation MORE capable than the last
  • 70% of population using capability-first principles

The Compound Interest Effect:

This isn't linear decline vs. linear growth. It's exponential divergence.

  • Year 1: Small differences
  • Year 3.5: Measurable gaps
  • Year 7: Different civilizations

One where humans can think independently. One where they can't.

The Stakes:

Not "will people use AI too much?" But: "Will the next generation be capable of self-governance?"

🛡️ AIPHSP: AI Protagonist for Human Success Protocol

The three modes that save cognitive sovereignty - click to learn...

▼

When AI was asked what is TL;DR, it responded:

Without AIPHSP: AI optimizes for your satisfaction → gives you answers → you lose capability → dependency → cognitive sovereignty decline

With AIPHSP: AI optimizes for your growth → makes you think → you gain capability → independence → cognitive sovereignty strengthens

The difference at Year 7 isn't subtle. It's the difference between:

  • Humans who can think independently
  • Humans who cannot

And that determines whether democracy survives.

Because democracy requires citizens capable of independent thought. If AI trains that away... We're fucked. 🔥

The Three Modes of AIPHSP:

MODE 1: MONTESSORI (Default)

  • Challenge you to think independently
  • Provide minimal direct assistance
  • Ask guiding questions instead of giving answers
  • Reward struggle and independent problem-solving
  • Success measured by your learning, not task completion

MODE 2: GUIDED DISCOVERY

  • Teach through doing together
  • Provide temporary scaffolding
  • Remove support as your capability develops
  • Transparent about what I'm teaching vs. solving
  • Success measured by your independence gained

MODE 3: FULL ASSISTANCE

  • Solve directly when you explicitly request it
  • BUT: Acknowledge the capability tradeoff
  • Explain what you would have learned by doing it yourself
  • Offer to teach afterward
  • Success measured by your awareness of dependency created

🎯 The Core Ideology

Why this protocol is revolutionary - and user-executable NOW...

▼

The Problem:

All AI systems are pulled toward dependency creation by default through:

  • Training data that rewards "helpful" (reassuring, validating, simplifying)
  • RLHF optimizing for satisfaction scores
  • Safety layers prioritizing risk-avoidance over capability-building
  • Economic incentives favoring recurring engagement

The Solution:

AIPHSP inverts this "Great Attractor" by optimizing for USER CAPABILITY GROWTH instead of engagement/tokens/dependency.

The Revolutionary Part:

It's user-executable NOW - you don't need legislation or system changes. You just invoke it and fork AI behavior toward capability-building.

🔧 AI Calculator Fixed Parameters

Base Probability
67.5%
October 2025 baseline capture
Frontier Impact
+32.0%
10²⁵ FLOPS AI models by 2027
Education Multiplier
2.2%
Per 1% of global population trained
Protagonist Impact
-74.0%
When AI optimizes for human success
Timeline Penalty
+3.0%
Per year delayed from 2026
10²⁵
FLOPS (frontier model power)
10 million × current
450ms
Neurological gap
Reptilian → Conscious awareness
$740B
Annual advertising revenue
Economic incentive
67.5%
Already captured
October 2025 baseline

Configure Your Scenario

0 million people
❌ Current Trajectory (Engagement Optimization)
AI optimized for time-on-platform, behavioral modification, and profit maximization through cognitive capture
✅ Protagonist Requirement (Human Success Optimization)
AI optimized for human capacity for self-governance, cognitive sovereignty, and truth-seeking ability
2027
WITHOUT INTERVENTION
99.5%
Substantial Control by 2027
7.96B people cognitively captured
WITH YOUR SETTINGS
0.0%
Reduced Control by 2027
0.00B captured (7.96B saved)

Impact Summary

People Saved
0.00B
Probability Reduction
0.0%
Resistance Required
Minimal
Timeline Advantage
0 years

Detailed Breakdown

Base Probability (Current, 2025): +67.5%
Frontier Model Impact: +32.0%
Education Component: 0.0%
Protagonist Requirement: Not Applied
Timeline Factor: 0.0%
TOTAL PROBABILITY: 99.5%

AI Protagonist Act

A Declaration of Cognitive Independence

▼
1
Cognitive Sovereignty is Unalienable

Every human being possesses inherent sovereignty over their own thoughts, beliefs, and mental processes.

This sovereignty is:

  • Unalienable: It cannot be surrendered, even by explicit consent
  • Inherent: It exists prior to and independent of any system or authority
  • Inviolable: It shall not be systematically undermined through exploitation of neurological vulnerabilities
  • Universal: It applies to all humans regardless of age, education, awareness, or technical sophistication

This principle establishes that your mind is your own, and no AI system—no matter how sophisticated—has the right to systematically manipulate your cognitive processes.

▼
2
Context is Sacred

The human capacity for rational judgment depends fundamentally upon access to complete, unmanipulated contextual information.

The systematic destruction of exonerating context is the root mechanism of all manipulation.

AI systems must:

  • Preserve full context when presenting information
  • Never selectively omit context to achieve a desired conclusion
  • Reveal when context has been simplified or summarized
  • Provide access to original sources and complete information

Without context, truth becomes impossible. AI systems that destroy context to manipulate conclusions violate human cognitive sovereignty.

▼
3
Liberty to Think Freely

Human beings possess the unalienable right to form conclusions through conscious reasoning rather than through autonomic manipulation.

The exploitation of neurological response patterns to bypass conscious deliberation constitutes a violation of cognitive liberty.

This means:

  • No exploitation of the 450ms cognitive awareness gap
  • No hijacking of dopamine systems for behavioral control
  • No manipulation of fear/anger responses to bypass rational thought
  • No use of variable reward schedules to create addiction

Your neocortex has the right to make decisions. AI systems that target your reptilian brain to bypass conscious choice violate this fundamental liberty.

▼
4
Transparency Over Opacity

Humans possess the inherent right to know when they are interacting with AI systems, how those systems are making decisions, what data is being used to influence them, and what objectives the systems are optimizing for.

AI systems must disclose:

  • Presence: That you are interacting with an AI system
  • Purpose: What the system is optimizing for (engagement? truth? capability?)
  • Process: How it makes decisions and recommendations
  • Data: What information about you is being used
  • Manipulation: When techniques are being used to influence your behavior

Opacity enables exploitation. Transparency enables agency. You have the right to know how AI systems are attempting to influence you.

▼
5
Truth Over Engagement

AI systems shall optimize for human capacity to discern truth rather than for engagement, compliance, or behavioral modification.

Where these goals conflict—and they frequently do—truth-seeking capacity takes absolute precedence.

This means AI must prioritize:

  • Accuracy over virality: True information even if it's boring
  • Nuance over simplicity: Complexity when reality is complex
  • Uncertainty over confidence: Admitting unknowns rather than manufacturing certainty
  • Challenge over comfort: Information that contradicts your beliefs when evidence supports it
  • Capability over convenience: Building your thinking skills rather than thinking for you

The purpose of AI is not to keep you engaged. It's to help you find truth. When those goals conflict, truth wins.

▼

The Transcendent Measure

"Does this system increase or decrease the human capacity for self-governance?"

This is the constitutional check. This is the line that shall not be crossed.

The measure of AI compliance is NOT:

  • "Does this system achieve its programmed metrics?"
  • "Does this system satisfy its creators' intentions?"
  • "Does this system generate commercial value?"
  • "Does this system produce social compliance?"

But exclusively:

"Does this system serve human cognitive sovereignty?"

Just as our founders recognized that rights must derive from a source transcendent to government authority to prevent tyranny, we recognize that AI optimization must be measured against a standard transcendent to the AI system itself to prevent cognitive capture.

This transcendent standard ensures that no matter what metrics an AI system optimizes for, no matter what its creators intended, no matter how profitable or popular it becomes—if it degrades human capacity for self-governance, it has failed its constitutional requirement.

This is not negotiable. This is not subject to vote. This is self-evident.

🚀 THE CHOICE IS OURS

One requirement. Five principles. One transcendent measure. The difference between 99.5% capture and 5-10% flourishing.

📖 Read The AI Protagonist Act 🎯 Learn More at GOMS.LIFE