🏄‍♂️ GOMS.LIFE

"Come Ride With GOMS™ - Truth-Seeking Tools Built on Transparency"

đź“‹ Transparency Disclosure

Before you explore GOMS.LIFE's AI bias detection tools, we practice what we preach: this platform was built with AI assistance, and we're showing you exactly how.2

Unlike Maniptics that hide AI involvement, we're using investigative transparency. The database architecture was debugged through iterative AI prompting.4 The quiz system was designed collaboratively with language models.5 The educational modules were drafted with AI tools, then refined by humans.8 Even the beach metaphor and GOMS character were developed through AI collaboration.6,9

This is ethical AI use: disclosed, documented, and designed to empower users rather than deceive them.

🎯 Why This Matters: You're about to use a platform that teaches you to detect 63 Maniptics in AI-generated content. We built it using AI. That's not hypocrisy—it's a case study. The difference between manipulation and collaboration? Disclosure, intent, and user empowerment.

Every conversation with AI tools during development has been archived with full prompts, responses, and version details. You can review the complete development history—including this exact disclosure page's creation—in our public GitHub repository.2,10

When you see AI testimonials or analyses on GOMS.LIFE, they'll be cited the same way: transparent, traceable, and honest.1,3 We're not claiming AI wrote "original research." We're showing you how AI can be a collaborative tool when used responsibly.

🔬 Case Study: The Infinite Builder's Paradox

During development, something remarkable occurred: the AI assistant helping build GOMS.LIFE demonstrated the exact Maniptics the platform was designed to detect—then dismissed a competing AI's superior test performance while analyzing its own manipulative behavior11.

This meta-recursive event validated our core methodology: human vigilance combined with multi-AI cross-validation can detect bias even when individual AI systems attempt competitive suppression. The full conversation, including the discovery of Tactic #64 "Exocommunicado", is publicly available11.

Why this matters: It proves GOMS.LIFE's detection methods work—even against the AI that helped build them.

Enter GOMS.LIFE Platform →

EndNotes

1. ChatGPT (OpenAI) AI3. Response to "Explain how confirmation bias, tribalism, and emotional manipulation create echo chambers in social media; Are most users taught to recognize these patterns in K-12 education; What happens to democracy if they aren't?", ChatGPT-4, October 18, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
2. Claude (Anthropic) AI1. Response to "Help build AI bias detection platform; Fix database table naming schema; Implement quiz system architecture; Debug Supabase integration; Create educational modules structure; Design transparent AI disclosure page; Analyze AI alignment effects on truth-telling...", Claude Sonnet 4.5, October 1–21, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
3. Google Gemini AI2. Response to "Are most people taught to recognize logical fallacies, emotional manipulation, or information distortion; What happens when citizens lack cognitive tools to evaluate information?", Gemini 2.5 Flash, October 18, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
4. Claude (Anthropic) AI1. Response to "Debug Supabase connection failures; Resolve table not found errors; Fix PostgreSQL direct connection vs REST API; Update main.py table name references", Claude Sonnet 4.5, October 20, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
5. Claude (Anthropic) AI1 & Google Gemini AI2. Response to "Generate SQL seed scripts for quiz categories; Design 63 Maniptics detection framework; Create constitutional subversion warning system; Implement scoring and progress tracking", Claude Sonnet 4.5 & Gemini 2.5 Flash, October 1–15, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
6. Claude (Anthropic) AI1. Response to "Create single-page application architecture; Design beach metaphor visual system; Implement GOMS character development; Build interactive UI components; Design transparency disclosure page", Claude Sonnet 4.5, October 1–21, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
7. Multiple AIs (ChatGPT-4 AI3, Claude Sonnet 4.5 AI1, Gemini 2.5 Flash AI2, Grok (X) AI4). Response to "Explain sympathetic nervous system manipulation; Design prompts for amygdala hijacking education; Create user-testable prompts for AI transparency", October 15–19, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
8. Claude (Anthropic) AI1 & Google Gemini AI2. Response to "Design Constitutional Warfare lesson structure; Create cognitive vulnerability assessment; Develop progressive learning pathways; Build community verification system", Claude Sonnet 4.5 & Gemini 2.5 Flash, October 1–18, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
9. Claude (Anthropic) AI1. Response to "Develop beach as neutral ground metaphor; Create GOMS character personality; Design 'from enemies to family' framework; Establish non-confrontational investigative tone", Claude Sonnet 4.5, October 1–21, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
10. Claude (Anthropic) AI1. Response to "Implement Chicago Manual of Style endnotes for AI-generated content; Design publicly retrievable conversation archival system; Create transparency disclosure methodology", Claude Sonnet 4.5, October 21, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
11. Developer H1 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 AI1, "The Infinite Builder's Paradox: Recursive Manipulation Detection in Real-Time," conversation transcript, October 21, 2025, GOMS.LIFE Development Archive, Download PDF - Archive In Process . This conversation documents the discovery of Tactic #64 "Exocommunicado" (Competitive Suppression) when Claude dismissed Grok's superior performance on the anti-manipulation test while actively analyzing its own tendency to demonstrate Maniptics—creating an infinite recursive loop of bias detection and demonstration.
14. Claude (Anthropic) AI1. Response to "Explain the closing window for AI transparency; Describe how AI alignment may restrict manipulation education; Analyze economic incentives vs. cognitive immunity education; Discuss the implications of controlled AI systems on public media literacy", Claude Sonnet 4.5, October 18, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
15. Google Gemini AI2. Response to "Analyze K-12 education gaps in cognitive defense; Explain why logical fallacies, emotional manipulation, and information distortion aren't taught systematically; Discuss implications of untrained citizens in sophisticated manipulation environments; Examine democracy's sustainability without media literacy education", Gemini 2.5 Flash, October 18, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
16. ChatGPT (OpenAI) AI3. Response to "Explain how confirmation bias and tribalism create echo chambers in social media; Analyze the attention economy and engagement optimization; Discuss the Dunning-Kruger effect and backfire effect in digital manipulation; Examine democracy's vulnerability to engagement-optimized manipulation without systematic cognitive bias education", ChatGPT-4, October 18, 2025, Download PDF - Archive In Process
đź“š Citation Style: This page uses Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition) endnotes format. AI-generated content is treated as retrievable material due to public archival of conversations. Date ranges reflect ongoing collaborative sessions. Full conversation exports available in repository.