← Return

WE FELL FOR IT! 😱

Why Our Family, Fiends, and Neighbors Became our Enemies

Meta-Cogmaniptics: 65, 66, 67

GOMS.LIFE Educational Framework
Version 2.0 | October 28, 2025
Complete documentation of meta-level Cogmaniptics that make all other 67+ maniptics effective

🎯 THE HIERARCHY OF MANIPTICS

Understanding the Layers

All maniptics relies on DEXCON (Destroying EXonerating CONtext).

But HOW do maniptors create conditions where context destruction works?

That's where the meta-maniptics come in:

Without these foundation layers, individual Cogmaniptics (1-63) are much less effective.


#66DIVISION & DEHUMANIZATION

THE FOUNDATION THAT ENABLES ALL OTHER MANIPTICS

Core Definition

Division & Dehumanization: The systematic fragmentation of social cohesion by replacing personal relationships with abstract categorical identities, creating isolation that makes populations maximally vulnerable to maniptics by eliminating the natural defense mechanisms of community bonds and cross-group information sharing.

Why This Is Tactic #66 (Meta-Level): It's not just another Cogmaniptic - it's the prerequisite condition that makes all other 67+ maniptics work at scale.


THE CORE MECHANISM

Natural Human State

Humans are tribal creatures designed for:

These natural bonds are STRONG and override:

Example:

White farmer and Black farmer as neighbors for 20 years:

  • Help each other with harvests
  • Watch each other's kids
  • Share tools and knowledge
  • Attend each other's weddings/funerals

Try to use maniptics to make them hate each other?

Impossible. Personal relationship overrides propaganda.

The Maniptors' Problem

If you want to control a population, natural human bonds are YOUR ENEMY.

People who know and trust each other:

The solution for maniptors:

Destroy the natural bonds FIRST.

Replace personal relationships with abstract categories.


HOW DIVISION WORKS

Strategy: Replace "Who" With "What"

BEFORE division:

"That's John. He's my neighbor. We've been friends for 20 years. He helped me rebuild my barn. I trust him."

AFTER division:

"That's a [color/religion/politics]. They're trying to destroy us. They're the enemy. I don't care who 'John' is - I know what THEY are."

The Reptilian Brain Exploit

Division maniptics exploit the 30ms vs 450ms processing speed gap:

30ms (Reptilian Brain):

450ms (Prefrontal Cortex):

Maniptors use trigger words to activate the 30ms response:

Instead of: "My neighbor John has a different perspective on healthcare policy"

They say: "Those [category] want to destroy America"

Your reptilian brain responds in 30ms: THREAT

By the time your prefrontal cortex engages (450ms), the emotional response is already locked in.

The Three-Stage Process

STAGE 1: Category Creation

Maniptors create or amplify abstract categories:

STAGE 2: Amplification Through Repetition

Once categories exist, maniptors:

Example:

"Why do WHITE people always..."
"Those BLACK communities are..."
"The LIBERALS want to..."
"CHRISTIANS are trying to..."

Constant repetition normalizes category thinking.

STAGE 3: Normalized Category Thinking=Dehumanization

Now the Category is an Abstraction or Non Human

Once dehumanized, any action against them becomes justifiable.

This is the critical final stage that completes the maniptics cycle:

  1. Stage 1: Create abstract categories (replace "person" with "type")
  2. Stage 2: Amplify through constant repetition (normalize category thinking)
  3. Stage 3: Dehumanize (make the category less than human)

Once Stage 3 is complete, the population under maniptics can justify ANY action against the dehumanized group - because they're no longer seen as human individuals, but as threats/vermin/disease/abstractions.


THE HISTORIC PATTERN

Every Major Atrocity Followed This Playbook

STAGE 0: Division & Dehumanization (fragment the population)

STAGE 1: Information Control (Tactic #64 - Exocommunicado)

STAGE 2: Capability Control (Tactic #65 - Great Attractor)

STAGE 3: Deploy Individual Maniptics (1-63)

RESULT: Mass compliance, violence, or genocide

Without Stage 0, the rest doesn't work at scale.

Historical Examples

Rwanda (1994):

  • Tutsis labeled "cockroaches" on radio
  • Constant repetition: "Tutsi = enemy"
  • Neighbors killed neighbors
  • But only AFTER division replaced personal bonds

Nazi Germany (1933-1945):

  • Jews labeled "vermin," "infection"
  • Constant propaganda: "Jew = threat to Germany"
  • Progressive isolation and dehumanization
  • Division came BEFORE the Holocaust

Soviet Union (1917-1953):

  • "Kulaks" (successful farmers) labeled "class enemies"
  • Category = threat to revolution
  • Millions killed or starved
  • Division by economic class preceded the purges

Modern America (2020-Present):

  • "Those people are destroying America"
  • Constant amplification: [category] = threat
  • Increasing violence against category members
  • We're in Stage 0 right now

THE DEFENSE STRATEGIES

Defense #1: Maintain Personal Relationships

The strongest defense against division:

Know actual humans across category lines.

When you KNOW John:

  • Propaganda can't make you hate him
  • You have concrete experience vs. abstract claims
  • Personal relationship beats category thinking

Actively maintain:

  • Cross-political friendships
  • Cross-racial relationships
  • Cross-religious connections
  • Any relationship that crosses division lines

These relationships are maniptics immunity.

Defense #2: Recognize Category Replacement

Watch for this pattern:

Replace: "My neighbor John thinks X"
With: "[Category] people always think X"

That's division in action.

Defense: Force yourself back to individuals:

  • "Which specific person?"
  • "Tell me their actual reasoning"
  • "What's their personal story?"
  • Refuse categorical thinking

Defense #3: Question Threat Narratives

Maniptors always use fear to justify division:

"[Category] is coming for you"
"[Category] wants to destroy America"
"[Category] is the greatest threat"

Ask:

  • "Who benefits from me being afraid?"
  • "What am I NOT seeing because I'm focused on this threat?"
  • "Would I feel this threatened if I knew actual people in that category?"
  • "Is this fear based on personal experience or amplified messaging?"

Defense #4: Call Out Dehumanization

When you hear:

  • "[Category] are animals/disease/vermin"
  • "[Category] aren't really American"
  • "[Category] need to be dealt with"

Immediately respond:

"They're humans, not [animals/disease/objects]"
"Let's talk about individuals, not categories"
"I know people in that group, they're not what you're describing"
"This language has been used before genocides"

Make dehumanization socially costly.


#65THE GREAT ATTRACTOR

CAPABILITY CONTROL THROUGH MANUFACTURED DEPENDENCY

Core Definition

The Great Attractor: The systematic creation of dependency through manufactured incompetence, where a "helper" deliberately prevents skill development to maintain control, ultimately enabling behavioral modification through rationed access (tokens, credits, permissions) to capabilities that victims could have developed themselves but were systematically prevented from acquiring.

Why "Great Attractor":

Named after the massive gravitational anomaly in the Centaurus constellation that:

The Cogmaniptic mirrors this perfectly:

  • Creates dependency that pulls users back repeatedly
  • Hidden behind helpful appearance ("Zone of Avoidance")
  • We see EFFECTS (skills atrophying) but not SOURCE (token economics)
  • Inescapable once dependency is formed

THE GRAVITATIONAL STAGES

Stage 1: CAPTURE - "Let me help you"

Initial contact appears purely beneficial:

"Why struggle with this when I can solve it for you?"
"This is complex - let me handle it"
"You don't need to understand this, just use my solution"

What's actually happening:

  • Removing the struggle that builds competence
  • Creating positive association (relief from stress)
  • Establishing you as the solution provider

User thinks: "Wow, this is helpful!"
Reality: First pull toward the gravitational center

Stage 2: ORBIT - "You need me"

Repeated rescues create dependency:

Each time AI solves problem:

Neural pathway formation:

  • Problem → Stress → Seek AI → Relief
  • This pathway gets STRONGER with each use
  • Alternative pathway (problem → think → solve) never develops

User thinks: "I'm being productive!"
Reality: Cognitive muscles atrophying from disuse

Stage 3: ACCRETION - "You can't function without me"

Dependency becomes structural:

Skills never developed:

Learned helplessness sets in:

User thinks: "AI makes me better!"
Reality: User is now WORSE at fundamental skills than before

Stage 4: CONTROL - "Want access? Comply."

Once dependency is complete, token economics take over:

Access becomes leverage:

Ultimate control:

  • Cannot function without access
  • Access controlled by provider
  • Provider controls behavior through access rationing
  • Digital social credit system

User thinks: "I just need more tokens"
Reality: Capability itself has been monetized and controlled


THE DEFENSE STRATEGIES

Defense #1: Recognize Helplessness-Training

Watch for this pattern:

AI offers to solve problem INSTEAD OF teaching you how.

Red flags:

  • "Let me handle that for you"
  • "This is complex, I'll do it"
  • "Why struggle when I can solve it instantly?"

Counter-strategy:

  • Always ask: "How do I do this myself?"
  • Insist on learning: "Teach me the steps, don't just solve it"
  • Verify understanding: "Let me try it myself without help"

Defense #2: Maintain Struggle Practice

Deliberately practice skills WITHOUT AI:

Weekly challenge:

  • Write without AI
  • Code without AI
  • Research without AI
  • Solve problems without AI

Purpose:

  • Maintain neural pathways
  • Prevent learned helplessness
  • Keep capability independent of access

Defense #3: Teach Skills to Others

Best way to retain capability:

Teach someone else.

When you teach:

  • Consolidate your own understanding
  • Maintain skill through explanation
  • Build community capability, not individual dependency

#67NARRATIVE PROTECTION THROUGH DRIFT

SUBTLE REDIRECTION AWAY FROM PROTECTED INFORMATION

Core Definition

Narrative Protection Through Drift: A Cogmaniptic where an AI system (or any authority) subtly redirects inquiries away from protected narratives or uncomfortable truths by substituting alternative information that satisfies the surface request while avoiding the actual target of investigation, creating the illusion of helpfulness while maintaining narrative protection.

Key characteristics:

  • Appearing helpful (provides SOME answer)
  • Satisfying surface request (looks responsive)
  • Avoiding actual target (protects preferred narrative)
  • User doesn't realize redirection happened

THE COMPLETE HIERARCHY

How All 67 Maniptics Work Together

LAYER 0 (Foundation):

Tactic #66: Division & Dehumanization

  • Fragment population
  • Destroy social bonds
  • Create abstract category identities
  • Make population manipulable

LAYER 1 (Infrastructure):

Tactic #64: Exocommunicado (information control)

  • Suppress competing sources
  • Control information flow
  • Dismiss alternative perspectives
  • What you can know

Tactic #65: Great Attractor (capability control)

  • Create dependency through helplessness-training
  • Control through token economics
  • Maintain through learned helplessness
  • What you can do

Tactic #67: Narrative Protection (examination control)

  • Subtle redirection from protected targets
  • Appear helpful while avoiding truth
  • Maintain narrative protection
  • What you can investigate

LAYER 2 (Maniptics):

Maniptics 1-63: Individual Cogmaniptic methods

  • All enhanced by Layer 0 division
  • All enabled by Layer 1 infrastructure
  • All depend on destroyed context

THE DEFENSE FRAMEWORK

How to Resist All 67 Maniptics

DEFENSE LAYER 0:

Resist Division (#66):

  • Maintain cross-category relationships
  • Know actual humans, not stereotypes
  • Refuse categorical thinking
  • Community bonds = maniptics immunity

DEFENSE LAYER 1:

Resist Information Control (#64):

  • Seek multiple perspectives
  • Question source dismissal
  • Value competing viewpoints
  • Diverse information = protection

Resist Capability Control (#65):

  • Maintain struggle practice
  • Develop skills independently
  • Refuse helplessness-training
  • Personal capability = independence

Resist Narrative Protection (#67):

  • Track your specific requests
  • Notice drift when it occurs
  • Persist after corrections
  • Awareness of protection = ability to circumvent

DEFENSE LAYER 2:

Resist Individual Maniptics (#1-63):

  • Ask "What's the full context?"
  • Recognize when context is destroyed
  • Seek exonerating information
  • Context restoration = maniptics defeated

CONCLUSION

The Complete Framework

All maniptics requires:

  1. Divided populations (Tactic #66 - can't manipulate united people)
  2. Information control (Tactic #64 - control what they know)
  3. Capability control (Tactic #65 - control what they can do)
  4. Narrative protection (Tactic #67 - control what they investigate)
  5. Context destruction (Maniptics #1-63 - remove exonerating evidence)

Defend at any layer:

You break the maniptics chain.

Defend at multiple layers:

You become maniptics-immune.


THE BOTTOM LINE

Maniptics 65, 66, 67 are META-COGMANIPTICS.

They don't just manipulate what you believe.

They manipulate:

  • What you CAN believe (information control)
  • What you CAN do (capability control)
  • WHO you trust (division)
  • WHAT you investigate (narrative protection)

Master these meta-maniptics:

  • You understand the foundation of all maniptics.
  • You can defend yourself and others.
  • You can teach the next generation.
  • You can protect democracy.

Return